JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 7, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Mayury Francely Ospina Téllez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Juzgado Quinto Laboral Del Circuito De Ibague Vs. Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Ibague.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad pública del orden nacional
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento directo de conflicto de competencia para evitar dilaciones injustificadas y proteger derechos fundamentales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente contentivo de la tutela contra la Presidencia de la República, el Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público, el Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, la Red de Solidaridad Social, FONVIVIENDA, la Gobernación del Tolima y la Alcaldía Municipal de Ibagué al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibagué, Sala Civil-Familia para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, de conformidad con el Art. 1°, numeral 1°, inciso 1° del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional, en ejercicio de sus atribuciones constitucionales y legales,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por Mayury Francely Ospina Tellez, contra la Presidencia de la Republica, el Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico, el Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial, la Red de Solidaridad Social, FONVIVIENDA, la Gobernacion del Tolima, y la Alcaldia Municipal de Ibague al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibague, Sala Civil-Familia para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.